Did you read yesterdays NY Times piece about guerrilla marketing? What's happening with our business??? In case you missed it, here are some highlights (from my POV, of course!):
I look at this as an art form," said Helen Wallace MacDonald, an energetic "field agent" in a guerrilla marketing street team, as she searched a Manhattan subway station for places to affix static-cling stickers that promote Le Tigre apparel. "I'm serious," she said.
Soon Ms. MacDonald, 25, found an outlet, smoothing the Tigre logo - a sprinting tiger - over part of an ad for a temporary Target store in Bridgehampton, N.Y.
The stickers are easily removed, but Le Tigre is banking on this guerrilla campaign to leave a mark on the minds of young, trend-conscious consumers.
In doing so, Le Tigre joins the front line of guerrilla marketing, a broad range of advertising methods that strives to strike when people least expect it. Though publicity stunts have been turning heads forever, mainstream marketers are increasingly turning to guerrilla tactics as consumers prove more difficult to reach with traditional advertising.
An art form? Covering ads with other ads??? Is it really a guerrilla tactic to simply place your logo on someone else's ad? Think about what this could be delivering as the brand message. We're to cheap to pay for our own ads. We don't respect other people and their messages. We look for an easy way out. Worse, we don't actually have a message of our own, so we're going to simply plaster our logo on things in the hopes that it alone will generate the right meaning.
Is this what we truly believe will offer a sustainable business advantage to our clients? They're putting logos on top of ads! They’re not even creating a clever over-lay message that would use the existing ad to launch their message. The most serious question for those of us in the advertising/marketing industry -- is this the level of creativity that we want to achieve?
Or how about this method that was also in the article:
...described a technique called wash-away graffiti, which effectively "cleans'' a company logo into the sidewalk by scrubbing industrial-strength cleanser over a stencil.
"The concept is we're doing a service to the community," he told the trainees. "We're washing away the grime - just in a very distinct pattern. What, is someone going to arrest you for cleaning up?"
Come on, this isn't cleaning any more then it's a creative advertising program. And, in many cities, it's even illegal. Are we understanding the real audience feelings toward this kind of marketing? If the Yankelovich study indicated that advertising is at its highest negative perception ever, why do we continue to plaster advertising over everything, even other ads? With all of the creative talent in the advertising industry, when are we really going to put our brainpower into creating the kind of compelling experiences that will not only drive business, but will do so in a way that brings a joy to people?
Now, I thought that the following wasn't a bad promotional gig. Yep, at the end of the day, attractive, scantily clad men & women will always be a good marketing tool!
Outside Grand Central Terminal tomorrow, for example, six men and women will advertise a New York Health and Racquet Club class by spending hours flashing their underwear at strangers, who may notice that the club logo and "Booty Call," the name of the class, appear on the garment.
"Our street team will be going around and mooning the message to the masses," said Darren Paul, managing partner at Night Agency in New York, which organized the event.
A pretty woman flashing her butt at me? Yea, that will always get my attention! Of course, it probably still won't get me to the gym!
The New York Times > Business > Media & Advertising > Advertising: More Demand for Guerilla Marketing